The Screeds of Terri ([info]terriscreed) wrote,
@ 2001-02-18 20:07:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Terri's Top Ten Books: Feminism after 1985
IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER:

Luce Irigaray: Speculum of the Other Woman. Topics: philosophy, psychoanalysis.

Irigaray is the mad philosopher of feminism, and this book will show you how, and why. It starts somewhere mid-point in a crazed debate she is having with Plato, Descartes, Kant, Freud and Jacques Lacan all at once over the abandoned territory of the feminine in epistemology. And then it just gets wackier. I've read this text about six times and only understand parts of it. And yet, I keep quoting her, again and again. Essential essentialism for feminists.

Teresa DeLauretis: Technologies of Gender: Essays on Film, Theory, Fiction. Topics: film, psychoanalysis.

One of the most important feminist books on film in two decades, I think. This is the book to read after you've read Focault on sexuality, Laura Mulvey on "the gaze" in film, and Umberto Eco's stuff on semiotics. It challenges all these over-used paradigms, as only a genius Italian lesbian can do.

Patricia Williams: Alchemy of Race and Rights. Topics: Race, legal studies.

Though her focus is on law and race, Williams draws most of her stories from her life experience as an educated, articulate black woman in a country that isn't particularly interested in black women to begin with. One of the best examples of "academic memoir" in existence, and huge influence on my own writing style.

Linda Williams: Hard Core. Topics: film, pornography, Marxism, psychoanlysis.

Many people know that this is the only rigorous book written on the topic of, well, hard core pornography. What many people don't know is that this is also probably the most useful explication of classic Marxism as it applies to feminist theories of representation, as well. I've used this book countless times: some of them involve a discussion of Deep Throat, true. Mostly though, I use it when a clear explanation of terms like "commodity fetishism" is needed.

Drucilla Cornell:The Imaginary Domain: Abortion, Pornography and Sexual Harrassment.Topics: law, philosophy

I think Cornell is the smartest feminist living today. Her grasp of philosophy, law and psychoanalysis is staggering, evidenced by the fact that she can take on three of the biggest hot botton topics in feminism and kick ass with them. The concept of the "imaginary domain" should be mandatory for any discussion on women's issues henceforth.

Gayatri Spivak: Outside in the Teaching Machine. Topics: international politics, Marxism, psychoanalysis

If you had to read just one book on the promises and perils of "international feminism" , this would be the one to read. Gayatri Spivak has made a life's work of complicating the ridiculous sexism and racism that fuels "do-good" programs like forced sterilization. She also makes you think twice about wife burning, bonded prostitution and other issues that seem to never be discussed in a rational way outside the pages of her books.

Judith Butler: Bodies the Matter. Topics: Queer theory.

Skip the now-famous Gender Trouble. This is the Judith Butler book you should read. Butler is unparralled in the area of queer theory, and every chapter in this book is mind blowing. Even if it is written in that infamous Butlerian prose.

Anne Fausto Sterling: Sexing the Body. Topics: biology, medical history.

Ever wonder how a medically trained feminist deals with the question"What is Gender"? Fausto-Sterling's essays span such enormous range--from discussions on brain chemistry, to medical debates regarding intersexuality, to historical models of endricinology--that she is a veribable one stop shop.

Donna Haraway: Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan?_Meets_OncoMouse? Topics: Bio-ethics, cyberculture.

Yes, the title is ridiculous. Yes, the artwork is ridiculous. Yes it sprawls. But WHO ELSE is going to take on genetic engineering, sweatshop laborers and interace theory for feminists? Donna Haraway is smarter than all of us combined, and the things she writes that are mocked now are quoted like scripture ten years later. Mark my words.



(Post a new comment)


[info]museumfreak
2001-02-18 09:41 pm UTC (link)
Thank you for the list! I look forward to reading all of these! I'm mad in love with Irigaray, Mulvey, Modleski (sp?), Haraway, Spivak, Cixous, Blackwood, Pollock, Garber, Anzaldua, and Trinh, for my part.

Kathy

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]tsenft
2001-02-18 10:01 pm UTC (link)
Kathy,

Go post your own annotated list on your journal!! I'd love to read it.

I must give Anzaldua another try. The mestiza stuff just seems so, well, obvious to me. But so many smart people love her...I will revisit! Same with Cixous--I use Irigaray for one stop shopping on l'ecriture feminine, which isn't quite fair to the movement, I suppose...

Funny how Kristeva makes neither of our lists! Nor Catherine Clement. And no material culture people for you??

Trihn Ti Mihn Ha (I never spell it right) When the Moon Waxes Red...oh such a lovely book. I'm not sure if Rey Chow has a book yet but that would be an awesome read as well, I am very sure.

I'm using Modelski in my own work quite a bit, because there really isnt anyone better writing on women and television right now. She and/or Peggy Phelan's Unmarked probably belong on my list.

I don't know of Pollock or Blackwood! Heading to Amazon at ONCE.

xo T

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]museumfreak
2001-02-18 10:49 pm UTC (link)
Really? The only thing I've read by Modeleski is the Hitchcock.

I haven't read as much Trinh as I would like to.

Material culture people . . . I can't think of many material culture feminist theorists who I would put in the same league with these other people. I suppose Gonzalez, Grier, Dobres, Gero, et al., but they are of lesser caliber.

I have read Kristeva, but I have a REALLY difficult time with her. I like her basic linguistics textbook better than her theoretical feminism . . . but I may just not understand it well.

Griselda Pollock is a 19th century art historian and a psychoanalytic feminist. She is probably one of the foremost feminist art historians at the moment. You would like the essay she has in _With Other Eyes_ . . . she can get kind of dense though. Big time Kristeva person.

Evelyn Blackwood is an anthropologist . . . the thing I just finished by her is "Falling in Love with An-Other Lesbian" in Taboo.

Oh, and I forgot Sherry Ortner (ling anth / structuralism) and Linda Nochlin (art history).

Who is Catherine Clement???

Have you read Manifesta? I've been hearing a lot about that book.

Some other random comments:
I would still recommend the book _The Dime Museum in America_ to you (it's a diss from your program) for the section on freaks--although I think Andrea Dennett is derivative.

Do you know anything about German Expressionist silent cinema? I had to watch The Last Laugh for film class today and just didn't get it. I LOVE Ma Vie En Rose, however, which we also had to watch for that class--if you haven't seen that you MUST.

Your chat room is down, and I have NO idea how to use IRC (the web client doesn't work), so I haven't been able to talk to you, but I look forward to meeting you again somewhere online sometime if you provide directions! I haven't been around much because I've been sick, stressed, and very nearly manic.

I just read some of the articles you have on your site about your mother. Wow. I'm really sorry, Terri--but glad that writing has helped you work through it.

Anyway, I will write more soon . . . I really should consider finishing the article I'm reading and the list I'm making and going to sleep.

Hugs and snuggles,
Kathy

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]museumfreak
2001-02-18 10:58 pm UTC (link)
OK . . . got web client for IRC chat working . . . send me e-mail next time you plan to be on! --K

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]museumfreak
2002-04-07 01:37 am UTC (link)
Now I would add Esther Newton, who's sort of the queen of anthropological understandings of camp. She also really understands butch/femme. And of course Judy Butler, who I'm surprised I wasn't listing at that time.

I still can't think of any material culture feminist theorists. I think the cyborg theory and prosthetics understanding that Jennifer Gonzalez has is probably the closest thing to an integrated approach of material culture and feminism, Marxism aside. You actually really should read Jennifer Gonzalez if you haven't because I think she has a theoretical framework that would add to your thinking. You'll find a quite accessible article by her in the feminist issue of Visual Anthropology Review published a few years back.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]museumfreak
2001-02-18 09:42 pm UTC (link)
And I am REALLY happy that someone has found 10 books published in the last 15 years which aren't from that horrible postfeminist movement which makes my skin crawl . . . what is wrong with Camille Paglia?!

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…